To avoid trouble for an official is a lifelong shame. General Secretary Xi Jinping profoundly pointed out that "responsibility and action are inseparable. Not taking action means not taking responsibility, and taking action means taking responsibility." He severely criticized some leading cadres for "not striving for progress, not serving as officials, and holding the mentality of 'being a monk hitting a bell every day'. As long as nothing happens, they would rather not do anything and be satisfied with being a 'peace officer' with stability and stability. These 'peace officials' engage in populism and act as' good gentlemen' when faced with problems, turning a blind eye to problems and tolerating and tolerating unhealthy practices. Although they may seem to have no obvious violations of discipline, they actually undermine morale, scatter people's hearts, and delay the cause. Over time, this will inevitably erode the spirit of entrepreneurship and undermine the overall development. To establish and practice a correct view of political achievements, it is necessary to take practical measures and implement systematic governance, focus on correcting the erroneous view of political achievements of being a "peace official", clearly establish the orientation of emphasizing practical work, responsibility, and achievements, and continuously create a clear political ecology of daring to do good deeds and striving for success. The so-called 'four levels of stability and eight stabilizations' is not about promoting stable and far-reaching work, but rather a passive and evasive political speculation. These 'Taiping officials' are deeply misled by the' dishwashing effect ', placing the' absolute safety 'of their personal career above the actual results and effectiveness of their career development. They' play Tai Chi 'in the face of contradictions and' beat the drum to pass on flowers' in the face of responsibilities, in exchange for the 'absolute security' of their personal interests. They are willing to act as "repeating machines" in policy implementation, and are enthusiastic about pursuing a formal closed loop of the process rather than breakthrough progress in the results. This performance style of politics, which only involves posture without force, makes even the best policies easily lose their effectiveness in the "last mile". In grassroots practice, 'peace officials' have become' flexible obstructions'. Faced with the demands of the masses, we have shifted from the past "cold and hard" approach to covert "polite promotion", using lengthy research and argumentation, process approval, and other means to construct an invisible barrier, suspending people's livelihood expectations in the "administrative maze". This kind of slow action and inaction not only widens the psychological distance between the party and the masses, but also invisibly undermines the credibility of the party and the government. The emergence of the phenomenon of "Taiping officials" is the result of the mutual influence between individual political achievement biases and imbalanced evaluation mechanisms. General Secretary Xi Jinping profoundly pointed out that "only with strong Party spirit and the abandonment of selfish thoughts can we ensure that our political performance view does not deviate." This important discourse hits the nail on the head: when selfish thoughts erode Party spirit, some cadres fall into the logical fallacy of "not washing dishes, not throwing dishes", and regard the mission of tackling difficulties as a career risk, resulting in a thinking bias of "doing more, making more mistakes". If rewards and punishments are not appropriate, diligence and slowness will not be distinguished; Inaccurate motivation leads to a trend of avoidance. When the pressure of accountability and positive incentives form an "asymmetric structure", when assessment indicators deviate from actual performance and fall into mechanical scars, the mediocre and unremarkable hidden rules objectively provide a "safe haven" for "peace officials": the adventurers who should have charged forward often retreat into obedient defenders in complex interest calculations. Making the "peace officials" who are stable in all aspects not "peaceful" is a comprehensive and systematic battle involving mechanism reshaping, guidance calibration, and ideological baptism. The key is to clearly implement the "three distinctions" and define them through institutionalized boundaries as reform innovators, down-to-earth and hardworking individuals, and silently striving individuals, so that mediocre officials who only want to be officials but do not want to do anything, only want to seize power but not take responsibility, and only want to shine but not contribute have no market. Improve the performance evaluation system, shift the focus of evaluation from "leaving traces on materials" to "putting practical results first", and through differentiated evaluation and penetrating evaluation, let those who fill in the gaps lose their market, and let those who are brave enough to break the ice stand on the stage, truly achieving the goal of ranking people based on performance and judging heroes based on practical work. It is particularly important to point out that only by deeply embedding the value benchmark of benefiting the people into the soul, making it a spiritual coordinate that transcends the mentality of "guarding the stall", can the vast number of leading cadres truly cultivate the spiritual realm of "success does not need to be mine" in the face of various risks and interest games, and shoulder the responsibility of "success must be mine". (New Society)