According to media reports, there are rumors circulating on the internet about so-called "strategies for taking the civil service exam" such as "ranking of positions within the system" and "guide to the most leisurely and immortal units", which misinterpret public positions as a "safe haven" for comfortable living. Although it may seem considerate, it actually misleads young people and must be vigilant. The essence of public positions is public services, and their original intention is to respond to the demands of the masses and ensure the operation of society, rather than being a breeding ground for comfort and pleasure. The so-called strategies of hyping up "lying flat positions" from grassroots governance to people's livelihood security, from window services to emergency response often amplify extreme cases and negate the mainstream style of the public service team in a biased manner. This not only misleads the public's understanding of the civil service profession, but also may cause some young people to experience psychological differences after joining, making it difficult for them to adapt to the actual work pace, thereby affecting work efficiency. What is even more alarming is that if the "lying flat strategy" is allowed to spread, it may erode the foundation of government services. The credibility of government services stems from the diligent performance and responsible actions of every public official. If the mentality of lying flat breeds and spreads in the team, and when faced with reform difficulties, shirking responsibilities and perfunctorily addressing the demands of the masses, it will erode the trust of the masses in the government. In recent years, various regions have persistently promoted the comprehensive strict governance of the Party, continuously rectified "lying flat cadres", and dealt with their inaction and slow actions seriously, fully demonstrating that lying flat has no market in the public service, and fulfilling duties and responsibilities is the only right path. The so-called strategies that advocate lying flat are neither based on facts nor ignore public responsibility, and must not be allowed to spread. Youth choosing to take the civil service exam is a recognition of responsibility and commitment, and this career choice deserves respect. The true strategy for taking the civil service exam should innovate methods and approaches to guide aspiring young people to enhance their abilities, better adapt to job requirements, and fulfill service objectives. Young cadres must establish a correct view of political achievements and understand that becoming a civil servant is not the end of their struggle, but a new starting point for fulfilling their duties and responsibilities. We should actively step out of our comfort zone, enhance our abilities through grassroots practice, and realize value in serving the people. Whether it is young people themselves, online platforms, or various sectors of society, they should adhere to the correct guidance, let the civil service examination return to its original intention, help every young person who chooses a public position, remember their responsibilities and responsibilities, work hard and conscientiously in ordinary positions, and write the answer sheet of youth with struggle. (New Society)