To fully leverage the exemplary and leading role of typical cases, today the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate jointly held a press conference to release seven typical cases of administrative public interest litigation to the public. The cases cover multiple fields such as agricultural land protection, food and drug safety, public rental housing management, barrier free environment construction, women's equal employment rights protection, and cultural relics protection. According to Geng Baojian, a member of the Supreme Court Trial Committee and Chief Judge of the Administrative Court, this batch of cases involves various types of public interests, which not only involve major issues of social governance but also concern the vital interests of the masses. As Case One focuses on the issue of illegal occupation of agricultural land, it strengthens the judicial protection of land resources through administrative public interest litigation in response to administrative agencies' illegal performance of duties such as punishment and custody. This has strong reference significance for similar cases. Case 2 involves the quality and safety issues of agricultural products caused by the abuse of pesticides. Through the combination of "administrative public interest litigation+support for civil infringement compensation litigation", it not only protects the social public interest of ecological environment and food safety, but also recovers the economic losses of beekeepers, achieving the integrated protection of public and private interests, and providing a new paradigm for handling administrative public interest litigation cases involving group economic interests damage. Case Three focuses on the safety issues of prescription drug retail, and through administrative public interest litigation, safeguards the safety of people's "medicine bottles". It has guiding value for protecting the safety of people's medication in accordance with the law and solving prominent problems in the field of drug safety. Case four focuses on issues such as long-term vacancy of public rental housing, malicious arrears by tenants, and loss of archives. Through administrative public interest litigation, it promotes the construction of digital archives for public rental housing, effectively promoting the full play of public welfare state-owned property in benefiting the people. Case five focuses on the illegal act of illegally setting up multiple steel pipe ground piles in pedestrian walkways, and through administrative public interest litigation, ensures the safe travel of people with disabilities, fully reflecting the meticulous care of the judiciary for the rights and interests of special groups. Case 6 focuses on gender discriminatory behaviors such as "restricting men" on recruitment websites, and promotes the protection of women's equal employment rights and interests through administrative public interest litigation, directly echoing and practicing the newly revised "Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Women's Rights and Interests". Article 77 of the law authorizes procuratorial organs to initiate public interest litigation against behaviors that infringe on women's legitimate rights and interests and cause damage to social public interests, which has a clear demonstration. Case Seven focuses on the protection of cultural relics during the Anti Japanese War. In response to the risk of cultural relics loss, substantial progress has been made in the long-term stagnant restoration of cultural relics through administrative public interest litigation. The legal protection of cultural relics and history has been transformed into practical rescue actions, laying a solid foundation for preserving the educational history of the Anti Japanese War period and promoting the patriotic spirit of "building a strong country through education". In addition, this batch of cases also reflects the deep integration of modern information technology and administrative public interest litigation. In case one, in response to a company's long-term and repeated illegal occupation of land, the procuratorial organ used satellite remote sensing technology to accurately identify the illegal occupation of land at different times; In case four, in response to the chaotic management of public rental housing, the procuratorial organs used big data to screen thousands of public rental housing units and accurately analyzed the problems in the supervision and management of public rental housing in a certain district. (New Society)