The inspection was conducted without hiding or seeking truth from facts, allowing us to accurately grasp the true foundation of military construction. Recently, a higher-level working group visited a certain brigade of the 78th Group Army for inspection work. The brigade's pragmatic approach to welcoming inspections was praised by the higher-level working group. At first, upon learning that the higher-level working group was about to inspect the work in the brigade, the first reaction of the brigade's training officer Han was to quickly identify work loopholes and try to let the higher-level working group "see the highlights". What Staff Officer Han did not expect was that at the work coordination meeting, his and other colleagues' suggestions, such as "borrowing the combat readiness package of grassroots units to welcome inspections" and "arranging advanced units to receive inspections", were immediately rejected by the brigade leaders. The attitude of the leaders attending the conference is clear: they will behave like usual during inspections. The original intention of the inspection by the superior working group is to guide the work, correct deviations, and promote the long-term development of the military by welcoming the inspection in a true state. The superior working group came to the team as scheduled. In the face of inspection, both the organization and the team of the brigade "do whatever they do on a daily basis", and the training and work pace are not chaotic at all; When the working group listened to opinions, the officers and soldiers spoke truthfully and one by one... "The development and construction of the military is a systematic project that must follow objective laws and integrate seeking truth from facts throughout the entire process. ”A leader of the brigade admitted that seeking truth from facts to a certain extent means "exposing ugliness", but facing and solving problems directly can promote the comprehensive construction of the troops more than avoiding and covering up problems. When it comes to the transformation of this concept, the leader talked about a previous experience. During an inspection, the department of the brigade carefully set up a route and issued an inspection notice in advance, making many requirements unrelated to the inspection content for grassroots teams in terms of hygiene, internal affairs, etc. Early in the morning on the day of the inspection, the company on the "inspection route" organized officers and soldiers to wake up half an hour early to clean up and organize the internal affairs, which disrupted the normal combat readiness order at the grassroots level. After discovering this phenomenon, the higher-level working group issued a serious criticism. it happens that there is a similar case. After a cadre of the brigade was appointed as the head of an advanced company, he learned that the research team of the organization planned to visit the company and carefully designed a "welcome inspection plan" in advance. However, the content of the welcome inspection was glamorous, but the daily work was repeatedly disrupted. The party committee of the brigade deeply discussed this phenomenon and felt that the root cause of the problem is the misalignment of the political achievements of a few officers and soldiers, who artificially cover up the problem. The work seems to be "hardworking", but in reality, it is fraudulent and loses the good tradition of seeking truth from facts. To this end, the brigade has turned inward and formulated and implemented the "36 Measures for Strengthening Grassroots Construction" and set up the "Grassroots Suggestion Award". The brigade leaders solemnly emphasized at the brigade handover meeting that all officers and soldiers who provide reasonable opinions to the authorities and put forward "golden ideas" for the construction of the company will be given priority as annual commendation objects; Those who are found to be exaggerating or exaggerating will be held accountable seriously. Leaders are willing to listen to the truth, so that officers and soldiers can let go of their burdens and speak the truth. ”The head of the organization department of the brigade told reporters that after the implementation of the "36 measures to strengthen grassroots construction", grassroots units have actively reported more than 100 issues, of which more than 30 suggestions have been studied and discussed, becoming new measures for the unit to strengthen construction. More than 10 officers and soldiers have been praised for proposing "golden ideas". At the same time, the brigade conducted in-depth mass discussions on "seeking truth from facts and emancipating the mind", organized officers and soldiers to learn from the glorious tradition of our party and military adhering to seeking truth from facts, educated and guided officers and soldiers to act according to objective laws, and further established the orientation of seeking truth from facts and pragmatism. A while ago, Staff Officer Zhang from the Training Department of the brigade found during a research visit to a certain company that the newly appointed Company Commander Zhou was very focused on training, but the enthusiasm of the officers and soldiers for training was not high, and the improvement in performance was not significant. After conducting a thorough investigation, Staff Officer Zhang found that Captain Zhou was somewhat impatient with military training and had "copied" the training methods he had implemented in his original unit to the company. However, due to the different backgrounds of the officers and soldiers in the two companies, the training approach of pulling out seedlings and promoting growth has led to a setback in their enthusiasm for training. To adhere to the work attitude of seeking truth from facts, we must not only do our best, but also act within our capabilities and use scientific methods. ”At the party branch meeting, Staff Officer Zhang pointed out the problem to the point, and Captain Zhou sincerely acknowledged and received the account. Afterwards, he made targeted adjustments to the group training mode. After a period of time, the training performance of the officers and soldiers of the company gradually improved, and the overall performance of the company ranked first in the quarterly training assessment. When it comes to this experience, Captain Zhou said with deep understanding: "The premise of seeking truth from facts is to accurately understand the situation and implement measures. Only by understanding the truth can we find the right direction to improve our work." "Hearing mistakes and making changes" is seeking truth from facts, and "daring to innovate" is also seeking truth from facts. At the beginning of this year, the brigade organized a training observation meeting, which covered some unmanned combat forces and required a professional leader to lead the training. However, there is a lack of professional backbone talents in the tourism industry. After careful investigation, Liang Shuang, a college student who graduated from a related major, entered the field of view of the brigade leader. This new recruit not only has a solid theoretical foundation, but also has excellent professional training results. However, during a mission briefing, some officers and soldiers raised doubts: the observation meeting is a key task of the unit, and there is no precedent for selecting a new recruit as the "leader". What should we do if something goes wrong? Whether there are precedents and whether something can be accomplished are two different things. Professional matters should be entrusted to professional people. ”A leader of the brigade pointed out that professional shortcomings cannot be compensated for by qualifications, and ignoring objective laws is a violation of seeking truth from facts. Sure enough, at the training observation meeting, Liang Shuang was highly recognized by leaders at all levels for his outstanding professional abilities. Nowadays, the brigade is promoting a pragmatic and realistic approach in all aspects of military construction: promoting and employing cadres, paying attention to listening to the opinions of the masses, and then conducting assessments; Change the previous practice of evaluating training results based on experience, use technological means for digital evaluation, and squeeze out the "water" of human emotions; Professional evaluation should be conducted before making decisions on major projects to avoid blind decision-making from the source. The superiors improve their work style, and the grassroots see practical results. A series of practical measures have been taken to help officers and soldiers focus all their energy and work on fighting, and to promote the comprehensive construction of the army to a new level. (New Society)