【 Improving Writing Style: Everyone Talks 】 Author: Wang Yang (Researcher at the Big Data and Philosophy Social Sciences Laboratory of North China Electric Power University) Conference notice, summary report, and speech materials. With the help of artificial intelligence, a "complete" official document is about to be published. While people are amazed by efficiency, they also find that such articles are becoming increasingly template based and formal. In the era of digital intelligence, big data and artificial intelligence technologies are rapidly developing, and some places and departments have introduced them into the office field. Many grassroots cadres call them "divine tools" for writing materials and devising solutions. Undoubtedly, the integration of artificial intelligence technology into the field of official document writing has significant advantages. However, it cannot be ignored that while enjoying efficiency, one should also avoid the tendency to 'hand everything over to the system'. When technology empowerment transforms into path dependence, artificial intelligence replaces subjective thinking, and human-computer interaction at computer desks dilutes grassroots visits and public opinion gathering, the resulting text will inevitably fail to touch on practical issues and answer public concerns. Looking back at the history of our party, this practice of "not investigating, not studying, and using pen to 'force write'" has been repeatedly criticized by Comrade Mao Zedong. In his opinion, "many people can write articles and give speeches without studying or preparing in advance; after writing an article, they don't read it too many times, just like washing their face and looking in the mirror, and then publish it casually. The result is often 'writing a thousand words, getting off topic for thousands of miles'." This reminder still has profound significance today. No matter how useful AI writing is, it cannot replace the "muddy" research. No matter how convenient video conferencing is, it cannot replace long conversations. No matter how comprehensive the indicator data is, it cannot replace the public's feelings. Only by combining the data of "key to key" with the sensory experience of "face-to-face", and conducting more in-depth research of "measuring with feet and recording with pen and paper", can the writing style become more practical and firm. (New Society)