This year's summer movie season is full of excellent films and surprises. However, on social media, there have also been evaluations of a certain movie that are polarized. This phenomenon provides us with a cultural perspective for observation and thinking. For a long time, the phenomenon of "polarization" in the evaluation of the same literary and artistic work is not uncommon, and everyone is "filtering" their viewing experience through their unique perspective. Many evaluations are no longer limited to the creation itself, with debates over elegance and vulgarity, classic debates, evaluation standards, and other topics arising constantly. The individual's evaluation of literary and artistic works is influenced by a combination of factors such as personal experience, aesthetic habits, and knowledge structure. Even the famous creators are inevitably roast; Even universally recognized classic works will not be praised by some people. For today's Chinese film market, the diversified phenomenon of literary and artistic works evaluation has a broader social background. 3、 The overall proportion of box office revenue in fourth tier cities is on the rise, with more diverse aesthetic subjects entering cinemas. The development of social media has made "everyone can speak and everyone can evaluate" a norm, and audiences have evolved from "receivers" of art to "interlocutors" and "observers", with more voices being "heard". This is a microcosm of the common growth of Chinese audiences and Chinese films, and it also presents a more intuitive perspective of diverse appreciation. All literary works must undergo rigorous scrutiny by generations of audiences, while constantly leaving room for discussion and improvement. When movies open up the diversity of the world, the richness of the times, the complexity of human nature, and the exploration of art to the audience, it becomes particularly important for people to understand and engage in rational discussions and criticism based on this. It must be noted that there is always a "greatest common denominator" in the public's evaluation of literature and art - whether a story is told well or whether vivid and lively screen images can be created. This is a hard lever. Under such common sense logic, we must be particularly vigilant against sensationalizing topics and the "comments" carried by traffic eroding the cultural attributes of literary works. We must also be wary of excessive "fan" filters that dissolve the objective laws of literary creation. Constructive opinions based on creation, the more the better; Labeling praise or flattery is unnecessary. Under diverse aesthetics, what we truly call for is a more inclusive, diverse, and healthy literary criticism context. Only by gaining insight into this richness can one broaden their horizons and experience the landscape of 'seeing mountains and peaks from the side'. Looking further, isn't the energy generated by this discussion also a form of 'commentary value'? For creators, through careful analysis, the value of such comments may be transformed into a new form of creativity, thereby finding a dynamic balance between audience feedback and creative autonomy. For the audience, every lively discussion can become an opportunity to break through the cognitive "cocoon", thereby breaking their own "preconceptions" and trying to experience fresh scenery and different moods beyond personal aesthetic preferences. Reaching the peak will inevitably involve numerous difficult journeys. The emergence of excellent works relies on the support of a large amount of creative practice and the interaction between observation and performance. As Chinese filmmakers continue to step out of their comfort zone, explore new spaces for expression, and discover new forms of art, a hundred flowers can bloom. Cherish the weight of popular literary criticism, continuously improve communication with audiences through tangible works, and make creation an activity that everyone can participate in - today's creators should have such vision and courage, such responsibility and commitment. (New Society)
Edit:ZhiWei Responsible editor:WangHai
Source:culture.gmw.cn
Special statement: if the pictures and texts reproduced or quoted on this site infringe your legitimate rights and interests, please contact this site, and this site will correct and delete them in time. For copyright issues and website cooperation, please contact through outlook new era email:lwxsd@liaowanghn.com