If it is difficult to train troops, then it is easy to advance; if it is easy to train troops, then it is difficult to advance. This applies to both combat troops and the field of national defense mobilization. A high level of practical implementation in national defense mobilization training can hone the team, improve the mechanism, and make up for shortcomings, laying a solid foundation for the efficient implementation of future national defense mobilization; If the level of practical combat is not sufficient, training will become a "flower rack" and it will be difficult to transform high-quality potential into the strength of the support troops. During peacetime, the practical implementation of national defense mobilization training faces difficulties such as difficulty in simulating battlefield environments, difficulty in standardizing methods and procedures, and difficulty in unifying evaluation standards. Everything has its requirements, and those who adhere to them will succeed. As long as we deeply grasp the characteristics, laws, and operational mechanisms of national defense mobilization, take advantage of the situation, and implement precise policies, we can effectively improve the practical level of national defense mobilization training. Specifically, in training practice, we should follow the principle of "six suitability and six unsuitability". Firstly, the construction of training scenarios should be practical rather than virtual. War is cruel and complex, and as an important link in the chain of joint operations, national defense mobilization must be trained in highly realistic battlefield environments to ensure battlefield security and serve victory. This requires abandoning one-sided idealized design, pursuing visual effects through scripted design, and ensuring smooth and stable push through design; Through in-depth research on modern warfare and its requirements for national defense mobilization, training scenarios should be created from multiple aspects such as enemy friendly attack and defense situations, battlefield demand reporting, emergency material delivery, protection of important targets, and transfer and evacuation of wounded personnel, so that trainees can truly feel the tense atmosphere and uncertainty of war, and enhance their sense of urgency and mission in carrying out mobilization and support tasks. Secondly, the training process should be strict rather than lax. From a certain perspective, national defense mobilization is a process of closely integrating the needs of the military with the capabilities of the local government. The military must have a clear understanding of what, how much, and who to recruit from the local government, while the local government must have a clear understanding of what, how much, and when the military needs. The organization of national defense mobilization training should design a scientific, rigorous, and interconnected training process based on this principle. Each step should be rigorous, standardized, and interconnected, and the process should not be simplified or steps reduced arbitrarily. Through training, participants from various levels of party and government agencies and industry supervisory departments should be familiar with and master the basic procedures and methods of national defense mobilization. Once necessary, they should be able to quickly transition from their regular work positions to wartime command positions. Thirdly, training command coordination should be smooth and not stagnant. National defense mobilization involves various aspects such as the military, government, and enterprises. In the process of connecting demand and supply sides, it is easy to encounter "information barriers" and "coordination obstacles". Training should be taken as an opportunity to establish a sound and smooth command and coordination mechanism, clarify the responsibilities and authorities of all parties, strengthen information sharing and communication cooperation, ensure rapid transmission of instructions, timely feedback of information, and consistent action coordination. During training, temporary situations and random adjustments should be used to allow all parties to enter the situation and roles, work together to break through bottlenecks and blockages, and ensure smooth supply and demand docking channels. Fourthly, the training content should be broad rather than narrow. Modern warfare involves coordinated operations among multiple military branches, and the content of national defense mobilization training should also strive for comprehensiveness, rather than just focusing on one or two areas. It should not only cover traditional mobilization of the people's armed forces, national economy, civil air defense, and transportation readiness, but also expand and extend mobilization to emerging fields as needed, ensuring that all mobilization elements and industry systems can enhance national defense concepts and mobilization capabilities. Fifthly, training methods should be new rather than old. The field of national defense is one that requires the most innovative spirit. In the current era of rapid technological development, national defense mobilization training should fully utilize advanced technological means and continuously strengthen the effectiveness of group training. For example, technologies such as virtual reality and augmented reality can be used to achieve realistic environmental simulation, accurate situational awareness, and efficient command and control. At the same time, utilizing technologies such as big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence to deeply mine and comprehensively analyze relevant data provides valuable references for enhancing mobilization effectiveness. Sixth, training evaluation feedback should be 'deep rather than shallow'. As the saying goes, "When it comes to compiling baskets, the key is to close the mouth." The evaluation feedback of national defense mobilization training is very important, but currently some units have not conducted in-depth and detailed evaluations or tracked the effectiveness of rectification after the training, making the evaluation feedback a mere formality and the problem cannot be effectively solved. To establish scientifically rigorous evaluation standards and methods, quantitative evaluation should be conducted from multiple dimensions such as command decision-making, potential exploration, collaborative cooperation, and troop feedback, objectively and fairly analyzing the achievements and shortcomings of training. On this basis, the evaluation results will be promptly fed back to the participating units and individuals, urging them to rectify in a timely manner, forming a virtuous cycle of "training evaluation improvement", and promoting the continuous improvement of the practical level of national defense mobilization training. (New Society)