The National Conference of High Court Presidents held by the Supreme People's Court on the 13th proposed that the people's courts should handle people's livelihood cases with the awareness of "like I am in litigation", grasp the demands of people's livelihood interests, and accurately use legal and judicial policy guidance. We must implement the policy of combining leniency with severity and combining punishment more accurately in juvenile criminal cases The Supreme People's Court proposes to avoid one-sided leniency, tolerance, and indulgence due to being a minor, as well as to prevent individual cases from affecting the implementation of consistent education, persuasion, and rescue policies. Only by fixing the division and stopping the dispute can we achieve the goal of 'closing the case'. The Supreme People's Court requires that the people's courts should strive for the ultimate spirit to determine and settle disputes. Both substantive fairness and procedural fairness are required, and judgments must comply with both legal provisions and natural principles. Interpretation and reasoning should be integrated throughout the entire process of dispute mediation, evidence review, fact finding, legal application, document preparation, and post judgment Q&A. The Supreme Court also proposed that fair judgments should guide the cultivation of social legal awareness. We should encourage and ensure that judges make more classic judgments that reflect the requirements of the times, respond to the expectations of the people, lead the progress of the rule of law, and promote social development. To guide judges to integrate "handling cases" and "summarizing cases", and to timely summarize and refine viewpoints, concepts, and rules for newly concluded typical cases. (New Society)