The combination of time and events determines the value of an article, which is commonly referred to as "problem awareness". A good writing style should and must face problems directly, point to the key points, and articulate ideas. Currently, some writing styles do have issues. Stacking concepts and materials, repeatedly interpreting and arguing around a popular concept on a flat surface, without advancing one step forward in cognition; Or they may follow the crowd and use clich é s, spreading thousands or even tens of thousands of words, without any origin or basis. They use the power of ancient times to argue, but argue based on the common sense that people know. And so on, there are plenty of them. Writing for publication, not for problem-solving, is the root of this writing style. This type of writing style has indeed reached the point where it has to be changed! Whether to face the problem directly determines the value of an article. There are various literary genres, and it is difficult to generalize the problems that an article faces, such as real-life social issues, natural science issues, emotional expression issues, academic theory issues, etc. The problems can be of any size, and the article can be of any length. However, there must always be a true question that cannot be denied, and a genuine sense of emotion that cannot be expressed. In ancient times, writing emphasized the concept of "for the time being" and "for the matter," which meant having clear questions and starting the trend of the times. Only then could the article have vitality and true insight. Directly targeting the key point means not going around, nor can it go around. A good article should first have insight, like peeling an onion, pushing forward layer by layer, and ultimately having a fundamental grasp of the problem being expressed. As the saying goes, 'With the chest holding a thousand treasures, one can rely on throughput; with a thousand strokes, one can move freely.' It is not feasible to 'make people aware' in an article just because it is dull. Secondly, in terms of expression, one should be able to clearly and accurately present the crux of the problem. From the layout of the article to the careful consideration of every word, all serve to reveal the problem. The style of writing, which is flashy but impractical and verbose, is actually using superficial grandeur and erudition to conceal the weakness of one's thinking and knowledge. The straightforward approach is to solve problems and propose countermeasures. The essence of countermeasures is to prescribe the right medicine to cure the disease. Only articles with clear ideas and context can take readers directly to the core of the article and truly solve the problems faced in writing. In short, a writing style that can speak with substance and face problems directly is a writing style worth promoting, and it is also conducive to shaping a better academic style, style, and social atmosphere. (New Society)