As the college entrance examination approaches, the market for simulated exam papers remains hot. There are various types of test questions in the market, and prices vary greatly. Compared to simulated test papers priced at tens of yuan, some papers labeled as "predictions" or even "test questions" skyrocket in price to three to four hundred yuan. At present, renowned teachers and AI predictions are all on the battlefield... are they really reliable? Can AI 'test taking' really become a 'miracle tool' for exam preparation? As long as you spend a few hundred yuan, you can get a high score and attend a prestigious school by buying a "betting tool", which looks too beautiful. However, whether it is a master or an AI, they are not the "magic weapon" for winning the college entrance examination. Blindly believing in exam questions is just a self deceiving illusion. If exam questions can be predicted so easily, wouldn't everyone be able to score high. In fact, stripping away the outer layer of marketing rhetoric, the so-called "betting tool" is nothing but an anxiety harvester carefully woven by businesses, which fundamentally runs counter to the "reverse betting" mechanism of college entrance examination questions and the scientific nature of educational laws. The "betting on success" claimed by businesses is often filled with word games, such as math problems being judged as "betting on success" simply because they test the same knowledge point and the question stem is completely different; Physics problems boast of successful predictions simply because of similar situations. This broad and outrageous judgment standard exposes the essence of the exam paper, which is actually just ordinary practice questions around the exam point, and cannot accurately hit the real questions of the college entrance examination. Instead of spending a lot of money on fancy but impractical test papers, candidates should focus on mastering the basic knowledge of the textbook and improving their problem-solving abilities. The various "famous teachers" and "masters" advocated by businesses are actually packaged and do not have real ability to answer questions. They only rely on a large number of questions to gain the probability of winning, and then use the banner of "authority" to deceive candidates and parents. As for AI betting, it is also a gimmick that outweighs the substance. With the popularity of AI technology, many people have developed trust in AI. Many bloggers use large models to generate exam questions and attract traffic on social media platforms. However, the so-called high similarity comparison is just a simple match between question types and examination directions, completely detached from the logic and difficulty of the questions themselves. If we say that the traditional "master bet on the topic", we need to spend some time on the topic, but there is still a threshold for ordinary people to do. Nowadays, AI question taking is too simple. No matter who it is, as long as they provide prompt words, AI can produce a simulated test paper in just a few seconds, which is very efficient. This is also the main reason for the rapid rise of AI question taking. However, AI generated test papers are not reliable, with issues such as incorrect questions, repetition, and inevitable nonsense. For example, recently in an AI generated test paper in a certain place, there were forged "Tang poems and poets", which was shocking. In the frenzy of "exam economy", the most alarming thing is that some candidates and parents place their hopes on "luck" rather than hard work. In fact, although there are rules to follow in the college entrance examination questions, they cannot be solved by just a few sets of "secret papers". Instead of blindly chasing after the "divine tool of exam preparation", it is better to identify and fill in the gaps, consolidate the foundation, and calmly welcome the college entrance examination. The purpose of education is to cultivate the ability of independent thinking, not to train "test taking machines". As a selective examination, the value of the college entrance examination lies not only in the scores, but also in testing the achievements of students' years of learning. If one ignores systematic review due to superstitions about "exam preparation", it is undoubtedly putting the cart before the horse. Rather than being led by the marketing rhetoric of merchants, it's better to believe in your own efforts. After all, the true 'magic weapon' of the college entrance examination is never predicted by others, but in the hands of the candidates themselves. (New Society)